How to Cite an arXiv Paper Without Losing the Version

You downloaded a paper, took notes on a result, and later copied a citation from a search engine. Before formatting it, check that the reference leads back to the same text. A preprint record, a revised manuscript, and a conference publication can describe the same work while pointing to different documents.

Have three things ready: the PDF or HTML you read, its arXiv abstract page, and your course or venue's citation instructions. The output of this guide is a checked source record with a version-specific link and a note identifying the passage you used. You can complete the process without a Rivul AI account or a paid tool.

Open the abstract page's Submission history and identify your version. arXiv retains earlier versions and lets you cite a specific one by adding its version suffix. Titles and author lists can change between versions, so compare those fields too.

Sources: arXiv: version availability

A link ending in /abs/1706.03762 has no version suffix. It opens the most recent version. A link ending in /abs/1706.03762v1 identifies version 1. The difference matters when your statement depends on a particular figure, equation, page, or wording.

Copy the version-specific identifier from Cite as on the abstract page. Keep it together as one string. Record the section or figure separately in your notes; the identifier selects the document, while the locator selects the evidence inside it. If you intentionally cite the work generally, an unversioned record may suit the task, but it does not pin a historical passage.

Sources: arXiv: reference and version-link guidance

1. Open the version named on your downloaded document.
2. Copy its complete abstract-page URL, including v1, v2, or the applicable suffix.
3. Write down the section, equation, figure, or page you used.
4. Open the saved link in a new tab and confirm that it reaches the intended version.

Attention Is All You Need provides a real example. Its arXiv submission history lists version 1 on June 12, 2017. A separate record appears in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 30 (2017). The table below compares citation destinations, not the scientific results or equivalence of the texts.

Suppose your reading notes came from arXiv version 1. Save the v1 link with those notes. If you subsequently choose the conference publication for your reference list, read the relevant passage there before changing the record. This avoids silently attaching a new publication record to evidence checked only in an earlier manuscript.

Sources: Attention Is All You Need: arXiv version 1; Attention Is All You Need: conference record

arXiv assigns DOIs with the 10.48550 prefix to its records. These resolve to the arXiv abstract page; they are separate from a DOI for a journal publication. An arXiv-issued DOI is therefore not evidence that the work has appeared in a journal. Version suffixes are not part of arXiv's assigned DOI, so retain a version-specific arXiv URL when you need to identify an exact revision.

Follow any linked publication record and inspect the paper before updating your citation. Check the authors, title, year, venue, and the passage supporting your claim. Do not combine a preprint's year with an unverified journal name or page range. If you have not checked the later text, retain the source you actually consulted and follow your venue's rules for preprints.

Sources: arXiv: understanding assigned DOIs

The example below is a manually prepared record for the arXiv version, not a journal citation and not output generated by Rivul AI. It uses an @misc entry, a version-specific URL, and a note. Your bibliography style controls which fields appear in the rendered reference. Compile the bibliography and inspect its output; saving a field in a .bib file does not guarantee that a style will print it.

If the printed reference omits the version or URL, follow your venue's supported field conventions rather than claiming the source is pinned. Keep the complete record and evidence locator in your research notes even when the final reference format is shorter.

@misc{vaswani2017attentionv1,
  author = {Ashish Vaswani and Noam Shazeer and Niki Parmar
    and Jakob Uszkoreit and Llion Jones and Aidan N. Gomez
    and Lukasz Kaiser and Illia Polosukhin},
  title = {Attention Is All You Need},
  year = {2017},
  note = {arXiv:1706.03762v1 [cs.CL]},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.03762v1}
}

Use this check after a citation-manager import, metadata refresh, or bibliography-style change. Those actions can alter the displayed record even when your research notes have not changed.

• The author list and title match the source record you selected.
• The entry describes a preprint or a publication accurately, without invented journal fields.
• The reference link opens the intended version when the claim depends on a specific revision.
• The cited passage is present in that version and supports your wording.
• The final rendered bibliography follows your course or venue's instructions.